Ok, so I did not want to be viewed as an opportunist and ride on the wave of worldwide mass discontent against a certain American Dentist-cum-hunter, Dr Palmer for the brutal 'murder' of Cecil the lion. Yes, murder. Oh my, i just cant help it sometimes.
For almost a month now, the issue of Cecil has been a popular trend on social media. Who is this Cecil? First of all, i have to make it clear from the very start that his name is something i will always frown upon. He is indisputably named after Cecil John Rhodes, one of the pioneers of British conquest in Africa with his Cape to Cairo dream. This is a man who wanted to paint the whole of Africa "red". I would certainly understand the anger of the British merely in this regard, the bitterness multiplied by the fact that it was their friend, an American, who delivered the fatal shot. Ahem to that, I'm no animal hater. To put this anger in context, I will direct myself to President Mugabe's speech on this Lion. He spoke about it from a point of this lion having been part of Zimbabwe's wildlife heritage. It is from this angle that i can understand this whole Cecil debacle. Anything other than that, i sense a hidden Agenda. I will expand on that later on. I will continue with what or, as widely reported now, "who" Cecil is.
What really made Cecil popular was the fact that he was the subject of the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge's research, collectively referred to as OXBRIDGE. He was under their surveillance. Now just imagine their anger when they discovered that their beloved lion had been the subject of a successful trophy hunt? Dear me, they went into overdrive about it. They just had to let the whole world know, and probably having produced the media gurus in BBC and CNN, the Oxbridge found a media all too willing to sell their agenda on their love of an African lion. I shall not condemn them for that, it clearly is their own business what or who they should mourn. My honest opinion however, is that this is a case of an outsider wailing and crying more than the bereaved. Surely, a very smelly rat should be somewhere nearby.
In order to sell this "agenda", however, it would not have been enough to state that Cecil was a lion in Hwange National Park living in captivity with the simba like dark mane. That would never sell. They had to cloak all that with the convenient banner of how much Zimbabwe would lose out from this "tragic" event. Imagine my bewilderment when i heard that a very popular lion by the name Cecil had been killed in Zimbabwe. My goodness me. Up to that time I, nor 99% of Zimbabweans, had never heard that there was one special animal, let alone a Lion, with that name. I mean, after all, we are not in the habit of naming the thousands of wildlife teeming in our virgin forests. We have lions, yes, we have elephants, yes, we have antelope and wildebeest, yes. But we don't have the cecils, the joshuas(Cecil's brother,fyi), the cecilias or other named special animals. No we don't. We have wildlife. This then brings me to the question-Was Cecil really that popular, even when he was a virtual nobody in his own land with countless of lions roaming around, or somebody lapped on his death for media attention and made him a martyr? Should we say that he was a prophet without honour in his own land? I don't know. What i do know, however, with how this panned out, if i had been shot the same way Cecil was, the international media would have given my death little or no mention at all. It would still have been all about Cecil the lion, my sorry self being left to my small family's tears. Animals vs Humans.
Following the Cecil issue in papers and on the internet really makes fascinating reading. I cant help but wonder if anybody has ever been given so much attention for their death, well of course with the exception of MJ and princess Diana. So i guess Cecil The Lion is our very own MJ in death then. CTL. In order to understand the intensity of the whole outcry, you should not look further than our own Government department responsible for animals, the ministry of environment. A whole minister, Honourable Oppah Muchinguri, had to hurriedly convene a press conference and roundly condemn the brutal killing of the "well known Cecil" whilst calling for the extradition of Dr Palmer to face charges of killing Cecil in Zimbabwe. Dear me. I don't think it was ill informed, but i think our minister should have been very careful, especially considering that she was seemingly succumbing to pressure from the west, something ill advised in Zimbabwe. But then again, i should go beyond the pressure to who was giving the pressure. These are what we call animal lovers with different organisations dedicated to ensuring the safety and safe treatment of animals and speaking out against cruelty to animals in all forms. For a minister to have commented, i can only imagine the pressure. And now, my thrust becomes clear.
Further from home, in America, the Senate Armed Services Committee unanimously approved S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes a provision to repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Article 125 of the UCMJ makes it illegal to engage in both sodomy with humans and sex with animals. Its repeal would, in theory at least, make bestiality not illegal. the effects of such a provision are enormous, and of unprecedented proportions. And yet, in their wisdom, animal lovers choose to focus on the death of Cecil than on a law that has the potential to effect cruelty of great levels to animals than death itself. But then again, who, or what, the Americans chose to have sex with is none of my business. My problem is with the animal lovers who find an excuse for silence when he who pays the piper makes potentially explosive decisions but makes all sorts of cacophony when it comes to poor old Africa. Animals vs Humans. I almost give credit to the animal rights groups, but my sympathy for them far outweighs my admiration of their work, or lack thereof. How many conflicts are currently experienced in the whole world? Iraq, South Sudan, Somalia, Syria, Libya, Nigeria? Endless. Thousands of people die due to these human caused tragedies. And yet, the voice agitating for Animal rights drowns, by far, the voice agitating for Human rights. Animals vs Humans. Where have we got it wrong, if ever we believe we have?
And so, what is this agenda that I was talking about. The furore over the death of Cecil has mainly been propagated by the western media. It dovetails with the west's agenda to prove that, for all intents and purposes, Zimbabwe is a failed state, and cannot even take care of its wildlife. The failed state aspect is another discussion for another day, but my point is, this death, rather than being called for what it is, an unfortunate event, has become so deep to the point of deserving the title, in bold and black "A NATIONAL DISASTER". Maybe even old Cecil deserves a hero's status as well, i don't know. (He was thirteen years old, and generally, Lions can live up to a maximum of twenty years in captivity, and fifteen years in the wild.) I shall follow all the sub stories with interest.
So do i think Cecil and his contribution is overrated? yes
Do i think humans are worth more than animals? definitely
Do i think there is more to this story? of course.
Like it or not, animal lovers really know how to make noise. If only some of that enthusiasm could be transferred to observing and protecting the sanctity of human life. Recently, a friend of mine told me that there exist some extremists who, when they see you wearing leather shoes, will insult and assault you for cruelty to the "poor" animal whose hide you are now putting on.